这个男人来自地球

Chinese Embassy firmly rejects NZ intelligence report hyping 'Chinese interference,' says claims rife with Cold War thinking_我的网站

A |     

    Latest news
China has firmly rejected and condemned a new annual report by the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service on Friday which once again fabricates and sensationalizes claims about so-called "Chinese interference" and "China threat," stressing that the report is rife with Cold War thinking and contains unfounded accusations against China.
This report is clearly linked to a series of recent negative developments in New Zealand's China-related policies, a Chinese expert told the Global Times on Friday. 
Recently, New Zealand has continuously toughened its rhetoric toward China, which to some extent reflects a form of "compensatory hawkishness" aimed at demonstrating its reliability within the Five Eyes alliance, Chen Hong, director of New Zealand Studies Centre, East China Normal University, told the Global Times. "Rather than reflecting 'strategic confidence,' this trend may reveal a sense of 'identity anxiety,'" Chen said. 
The New Zealand intelligence agency claimed in the report released on Thursday that China is the only nation pursuing espionage in New Zealand at scale, Radio New Zealand reported. It also claimed that such activity posed threat to New Zealand, which is the "most challenging of recent times."
Many of its unfounded accusations against China either maliciously label normal exchanges, communication and cooperation as so-called espionage or interference activities, or are simply baseless fabrications. China absolutely rejects and firmly opposes this, the Chinese Embassy in New Zealand said in a statement released on Friday. 
The release of this report at this time is part of a new round of attacks, smears and vilification of China orchestrated by certain international forces. In itself, the report may well be the result of foreign interference, the embassy said. 
In June, security agencies from the "Five Eyes" alliance issued a warning, claiming that Chinese spies used online job platforms to recruit people with access to sensitive information, according to a Reuters report.
For now, the annual report has further escalated its rhetoric, effectively creating a chain in which the Five Eyes' warnings and New Zealand's domestic threat assessments reinforce and echo each other, the Chinese expert said. 
The Lowy Institute said in a latest article on Thursday that New Zealand had long been considered the weakest link in Five Eyes and the easiest for China to try to cow. "But New Zealand has now called out China by name in its intelligence warnings so often that officials joke it has become tougher on Beijing than Australia is," the article said. 
The extent to which New Zealand's intelligence agencies have publicly singled out China has in fact gone further than Australia's, which, I think, represents a compensatory hardline posture, Chen noted. 
"New Zealand wants to demonstrate that it is a very active and very tough member of the Five Eyes. In fact, we have recently seen New Zealand take a high-profile stance on issues ranging from Pacific Island countries and China's relations with South Pacific and South China Sea nations to China's missile tests and other China-related issues. All of these developments can be viewed in the context of this policy shift," the expert said. 
This suggests that some forces within New Zealand's security and foreign policy establishment are consciously trying to demonstrate that New Zealand is not a weak link in the Five Eyes alliance, but rather an active participant, Chen added. 
The report also reflects the fact that some people both within and outside New Zealand do not want to see China-New Zealand relations develop positively. By going to great lengths to spread rumors, they seek to drive a wedge between the peoples of the two countries, create a chilling effect among the public, including overseas Chinese, undermine bilateral mutual trust, and obstruct the development of bilateral relations, the embassy noted. 
Their actions serve geopolitical purposes and the narrow, short-sighted political interests of certain forces. Their intentions are clear to anyone with insight, and their objectives will not succeed.
The embassy also noted that the essence of China-New Zealand relations is mutually beneficial cooperation and win-win outcomes. In recent years, with the joint efforts of both sides, bilateral relations have made steady progress. Bilateral trade has repeatedly reached new highs, bringing substantial income and employment opportunities to New Zealanders. 
People-to-people exchanges have continued to grow, with the numbers of tourists and international students increasing steadily, promoting mutual understanding and closer ties between the peoples of the two countries. The overseas Chinese community in New Zealand has played a unique and important positive role in this regard. 
Since China introduced a unilateral visa-free policy for New Zealand, many New Zealand tourists have visited China, witnessing firsthand China's development achievements and openness and inclusiveness, the embassy said. 
As a result of various factors, New Zealanders' understanding of China has become more comprehensive and objective in recent years, while favorable views of China and support for China-New Zealand relations have continued to rise
The embassy also warned those forces and individuals attempting to engage in political manipulation: Do not undermine the hard-won, mutually beneficial and win-win China-New Zealand relationship for your own selfish interests, thereby harming the interests of New Zealand and its people. 
Acting as pawns for anti-China forces internationally will ultimately prove counterproductive. Creating controversies in foreign relations will not solve New Zealand's problems; it will likely only make matters worse, the embassy said, urging these forces and individuals not to resort to desperate measures that will ultimately harm themselves, or lift a rock only to drop it on their own feet.
China attaches importance to its relations with New Zealand and is willing to work with the New Zealand side, on the basis of the consensus reached by the leaders of the two countries, to advance exchanges and cooperation in various fields, including political mutual trust, practical cooperation and people-to-people exchanges, and to better benefit the peoples of both countries, the embassy said. 
However, the development of China-New Zealand relations does not depend on China alone. We hope the New Zealand side will work in the same direction as China, rather than the opposite. Otherwise, the New Zealand side will bear responsibility for any consequences arising from such a course of action, it noted. 
。

B |     AI摘要      福建上杭法院审结全省首例适用《生态环境法典》案件，认定两家混凝土企业粉尘致果园受损，虽排放达标仍须承担无过错侵权责任，判令连带赔偿果农28.5万元。         福建日报·新福建客户端8月17日讯（福建日报记者 苏依婕 通讯员 温东英）8月17日，龙岩市上杭县人民法院对一起环境污染责任纠纷案作出一审判决，依法认定当地两家混凝土企业持续排放水泥粉尘的行为与周边柚子果园受损存在直接因果关系，判令两家企业连带承担相应生态侵权赔偿责任。

C | 这是自8月15日《中华人民共和国生态环境法典》正式施行以来，福建省首例适用该法典审结的案件。

D |     “水泥灰飘进果园，侵蚀果树、腐蚀土壤，大片果树慢慢枯死，几年心血全白费了。

E | ”说起自己的遭遇，果农老邱满是无奈。

F | 2011年，老邱在上杭县稔田镇楼岗村下斜角租下30亩地，种植红心柚，后来又引进泰国青柚，靠着这片果园维持全家生计。    2023年，甲、乙两家混凝土企业落地本村，甲公司在距离果园仅50米处建起水泥搅拌生产线，之后两家合伙运营，对外以乙公司名义生产。

G | 自2023年5月投产以来，该公司生产线的水泥粉尘持续飘入柚子果园，污染日趋严重。

H | 同年11月，不少柚子树开始枯萎死亡，老邱随即找企业协商赔偿，双方由此产生矛盾。    2024年4月，经稔田镇人民调解委员会调解，乙公司一次性向老邱赔付此前粉尘污染造成的果园损失3.8万元。

I | 同年5月，企业加装治污设备，但前期堆积的粉尘叠加日常扬尘，持续腐蚀土壤、损伤果树，果园受损情况并未好转。两家企业认为，后期果树衰败是农户疏于管理导致，不愿再承担额外赔偿。协商无果后，老邱以自家农场名义向法院提起环境污染侵权诉讼。    粉尘致害、农作物减产、土壤污染……由于这起案件涉及诸多专业难题，承办法官张兴发多次往返果园、厂区实地走访，委托第三方机构鉴定污染因果与财产损失。

J | 鉴定机构出具了因果关系认定，评估机构则根据原地修复、异地重建果园等不同的修复方案给出三档损失认定。    为破解专业认定难题，法院还引入了“生态技术调查官”，邀请农林专家一同现场勘验、取样研判。“叶片上白色结块检测就是水泥粉尘。果园无遮挡区域的果树烂枯、有竹林遮挡的长势完好，粉尘污染和果树受损的因果关系很明确，且与鉴定机构出具的污染因果关系认定可以相互印证。”生态技术调查官、农林专家刘德春解释道，泰国青柚根系娇气，粉尘长期改变土质，果树受损后无法复原，确实造成果农的损失。

K | 综合考量果树实际受损程度和果园经营现状，原地修复和异地重建果园不具有经济性和可行性，刘德春建议参照当地征地时对果树的补偿标准来计算损失较为公允。    审理过程中，企业方认为生产线已通过环评验收、排放检测达标，无需对果园后续损失承担责任。    “即使环评达标、主观无过错，也不能成为免责的理由。”承办法官张兴发当庭释明，依据《生态环境法典》，环境侵权适用无过错责任原则和举证责任倒置。企业排污造成他人损害，不管有没有主观过错，都要承担责任；企业要想免责，需拿出证据，证明损害与自身排污行为不存在因果关系，或者存在法律规定的免责、减责情形。    本案中，两家混凝土企业始终未能拿出有效证据，证明果树大面积受损与厂区扬尘无因果关系。综合全案证据、鉴定评估结论与技术调查官意见，法院最终认定，两家企业共同排污是果园受损的直接原因，判令双方连带赔偿果农经济损失28.5万元，执行时扣除此前已赔付的3.8万元。    “产业发展必须守住生态保护和群众财产权益两条底线。”省法院生态环境审判庭副庭长袁春怡表示，本案是福建省首例适用《生态环境法典》审结的案件，清晰地传递出法律划定的行为边界，污染者不能以“已经尽到注意义务”或“技术达标”为由免责，强化对受害者权益的保护，彰显生态环境法典以人为本的生态法治底色。无过错责任的刚性约束，也将促使企业将环境风险评估前置，优化生产工艺，从源头减少损害发生。

Current article:http://jluyv.tandianxiuzhutiaoshoudiamei.pics/list_360v/tvk4.html

Published on:06:55:20